Medicine is expensive.
Healthcare is expensive.
Research is expensive.
Life is expensive.
Is it worth it?
I read an article (thanks to @BrendonStilesMD for tweeting it) which purports that crizotinib (aka Xalkori, aka my life-saving medicine) is not worth the expense.
Yes, this is a very expensive medicine (about $10,000/month), and I am grateful to
Pfizer's co-pay assistance program which lowered my co-pay from $1,600/month to $10/month.
Perhaps what bothered me even more than the article were some of the comments, left by doctors:
"It would be justified if this drug really cures the patient and save a life. After all life cannot be measured in dollars. But it does not cure any cancer at all, merely delaying the inevitable end by a few months or (if the patient is very lucky), one or two years. What right have drug firms to charge such a huge price by pretending that a modest palliation is a cure?"
or
"One for the drug companies and a strike out for the patient."
How? I am not allowed to comment on the article itself (it is only open to medical professionals), but I would love to have a conversation with these posters. One big problem is that statistics are good at making predictions for populations, but they cannot determine what will work for an individual. I know many people who have lived one or two years on Xalkori (a few even three years) with a great quality of life. Yes, this is not a cure, but as my lovely doctor in Colorado said, the goal is to stick around for the next big breakthrough. There are other drugs in trials that give me the hope of tacking on another year or more as I wait for new scientific advances.
The other thing that this article forgets it that because I am on Xalkori, I am not on chemo. My medical bills during those months were many times higher (about $30,000/month). Chemo has the added side effect of depressing the immune system, leaving a person vulnerable to dangerous infections and costly hospitalizations. Thus, Xalkori is actually the cheaper path. Am I missing something?
Perhaps what they are really saying is that it is not worth the cost and effort to keep sick people alive. Which, I suppose, we could debate.
Well.
I think it is time to switch gears and take a look at what is possible.
Here is an inspirational, exciting, and funny speech by Dr. Camidge, head of the lung cancer research program at the University of Colorado.
My faithful readers may recall that I just flew out to visit with this group. Their program certainly lived up to the hype.
Take a few minutes to watch this. In addition to my obvious personal investment in this sort of thing, I am intrigued by how similar this kind of thinking is to how artists approach their work. Dream big, reach for the impossible, ask "why not?"
Some highlights:
- At 3:30, he talks about being a young scientist starting out. Some of the well-established institutions responded to his new ideas with “we don’t do it like that here.” When he visited the University of Colorado, they responded with, “we don’t know how to do that here … but we’d like to find out.”
- At 4:15 he tells a story that gives me chills, about a drug called PF-02341066. This drug is now known by another name, crizotinib (brand name Xalkori). And it is keeping me alive.
- At 7:55 he describes some out-of-the-box thinking, which his colleagues teased him about and called “pulling a Camidge.” This is now changing how cancer drug resistance is being treated.
He outlines the mantra that drives this cancer revolution.
- One size does not fit all.
- Don’t walk away from a good thing.
- If the cancer moves, follow it.
- Question everything.
Now THAT's more like it.
Along these lines, I am scheduled for a brain MRI on Friday (thanks to my consult in Colorado pushing to make this happen). Deeply hoping it proves unremarkable.
